The Supreme Court of India has extended its interim stay on a controversial directive issued by the Uttar Pradesh government concerning the ongoing Kanwar Yatra. The directive, which mandated that eatery owners along the yatra route display nameplates with the names of owners and employees, has been a subject of intense debate.
The Supreme Court’s ruling on Friday reaffirms that no individual can be compelled to disclose their identity under this directive. This decision comes amid criticism from various quarters, including members of the opposition India bloc, who argue that the order discriminates against Muslims and lower-caste individuals.
The interim stay was initially imposed on July 22, and the Uttar Pradesh government defended its directive in court on Tuesday. The state government argued that the purpose of the nameplate requirement was to ensure transparency and enable Kanwariyas (pilgrims) to make informed choices about their food during the Yatra. They emphasized the need to respect the religious sentiments of participants, ensuring that they do not inadvertently consume food that conflicts with their beliefs.
In a detailed affidavit, the Uttar Pradesh government cited “Regulation 2.1.1 (5) of the Food and Safety Standards (Licensing & Registration of Food Businesses) Regulations, 2011,” which mandates the registration of all food businesses and the disclosure of the owner’s photo ID and registration certificate. The government highlighted that many eateries along the yatra route lacked these credentials.
The affidavit also addressed concerns raised by petitioners opposing the directive. It underscored the strict dietary practices followed by Kanwariyas, who adhere to a satvik diet, avoiding onions, garlic, and other tamasic foods. The government argued that adhering to these dietary restrictions is crucial for maintaining the sanctity of the Yatra and ensuring the overall peace and tranquility of the area.
According to the Uttar Pradesh government, “a mishap in the form of taking a meal unwittingly at a place that would have otherwise not been of their choice could, for the Kanwariya, vitiate the entire Yatra.” This sentiment reflects the state’s concern about maintaining religious harmony and adherence to traditional practices during the pilgrimage.