In a significant political shift ahead of the Maharashtra Assembly elections, Deputy Chief Minister and Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) leader Ajit Pawar has denied earlier claims that industrialist Gautam Adani was present at a pivotal 2019 meeting between NCP and BJP leaders.
During an interview with ANI?s Smita Prakash, Ajit Pawar clarified, ?I said that he (Gautam Adani) was not present there. We were at Adani?s guest house, but industrialists play no role in government formation. Sometimes, due to our hectic schedules, mistakes happen in our statements.?
This remark contrasts sharply with his earlier claim, made during an interview with a news portal, where he stated, ?Amit Shah, Gautam Adani, Praful Patel, Fadnavis, and Pawar Saheb? all were there.?
Sharad Pawar?s Contradictory Statement
Adding to the intrigue, NCP patriarch Sharad Pawar recently confirmed the meeting took place at Adani's residence in New Delhi. However, he emphasized that the gathering did not involve any political discussions.
This flip-flop has fueled speculation and controversy, with political observers questioning the motives behind Ajit Pawar?s statements and the timing of his U-turn as Maharashtra heads into the second phase of polling on November 20.
Ajit Pawar on Yogi Adityanath?s Controversial Remark
Ajit Pawar also reiterated his disapproval of Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath?s divisive slogan, ?Batenge Toh Katenge? (If divided, we will be finished). Pawar said, ?I have publicly disagreed with this statement and clarified my stance in media interviews. Even some BJP leaders have criticized it. The mantra should be ?Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas??together with all, development for all. My perspective is clear: unity ensures safety.?
Political Impact
Ajit Pawar?s reversal on Adani?s involvement in the 2019 meeting has sparked a political firestorm, with opposition parties alleging inconsistencies in the NCP-BJP alliance narrative. This development adds another layer of drama to the Maharashtra Assembly elections, where political alliances and rivalries remain fluid and intensely debated.
