In a recent statement addressing concerns over Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs), Samajwadi Party MP Akhilesh Yadav reiterated his skepticism, stating, "…EVM pe mujhe kal bhi bharosa nahi tha, aaj bhi nahi hai bharosa, mein 80/80 seats jeet jaun tab bhi nahi bharosa…The issue of EVM has not died."
Yadav's remarks come amidst ongoing debates and controversies surrounding the reliability and integrity of EVMs in Indian elections. He expressed persistent doubts regarding the transparency and fairness of EVMs, emphasizing that his lack of confidence in the voting technology remains unchanged, even if he were to win all 80 out of 80 seats.
The issue of EVMs has been a contentious topic in Indian politics, with various parties and leaders raising concerns about potential tampering and the need for enhanced security measures. Critics argue that EVMs lack a paper trail, making it difficult to verify results independently and ensuring voter confidence.
Yadav's statement reflects broader skepticism within the political landscape regarding the electoral process's integrity and the role of technology in ensuring fair elections. His assertion underscores the importance of addressing these concerns to uphold the democratic principles of transparency and accountability in electoral practices.
In response to Yadav's remarks, supporters of EVMs highlight the Election Commission of India's (ECI) efforts to ensure the machines' security and reliability through stringent protocols and periodic audits. The ECI has repeatedly defended the use of EVMs, citing their efficiency in conducting elections on a large scale and minimizing electoral malpractices.
As the debate on EVMs continues to evolve, political parties, election authorities, and civil society organizations are expected to engage in constructive dialogue to address concerns, strengthen electoral integrity, and maintain public trust in the democratic process.
